🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a flawed assessment of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" policies pose an existential threat to European civilization. However, this argument rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true danger facing the EU is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Economic Divide Between the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by 87%, compared to a mere 13.5% growth for the European Union. During this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from 76.5% to just half of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly half of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Question

This widening disparity is driven by superior efficiency gains in the US, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly American. In the last fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over $10bn, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This gap prompts a vital question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations starting at a clear handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Innovation Gap

A number of key factors account for this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and agile network for funding startups. The EU still lacks a true unified investment market, which limits the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven different national regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

In spite of these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the need for major changes.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets could support far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe retains significant strengths: skilled workforce, excellent schools and universities, and world-class labs. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements could unleash a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if Europe does not become the leader in creating next-generation technologies, it can still significantly boost economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.